Why openend index funds are safer
Post on: 20 Июль, 2015 No Comment
MarkHulbert
There is a downside to how cheap and easy exchange-traded funds make it to buy or sell broad baskets of stocks: the danger of becoming a short-term market timer, a losing proposition for most individual investors.
If you want to invest in the broad stock market for the longer term, you may want to favor traditional open-end index funds.
ETFs can be bought or sold as easily as a stock and at any time. Open-end funds, by contrast, typically can be bought or sold just once a day — at the market’s close — and many fund companies restrict the frequency of transactions involving them.
One of the greatest comebacks in sports history
In the 2013 Americas Cup, Oracle Team USA fell to a 8-1 deficit to Emirates Team New Zealand in the first-to-nine series. What followed was one of the greatest comebacks in sports history. A preview of Against the Wind.
These differences might not seem large enough to change investor behavior. But there is some evidence that suggests they do.
Consider what is perhaps the most comprehensive study of ETF investor behavior, conducted by Vanguard Group. The study analyzed the transactions in nearly 400,000 retail accounts between 2007 and 2011 of four different Vanguard funds that give investors the choice of either an ETF or an open-end share class.
The individuals owning ETFs were more than twice as likely to fall outside the “buy and hold” category — 39% versus 19%. (Excluded from this category are any investors who reversed their fund investments — buying after previously selling, or vice versa — more than two times in a given 12-month period, or who completely liquidated their position during that period.)
Some of this difference was certainly because the ETFs attracted investors already predisposed toward active trading. But Vanguard — applying a statistical model that relates frequency of trading to various investor characteristics — found that this accounted for less than half of the more-frequent trading activity of ETF investors.
Furthermore, the Vanguard study may have underestimated the true extent of the increased trading activity to which ETFs can lead, according to John Bogle, Vanguard’s founder. In an interview, he contended that the typical investor in his firm’s ETFs trades less actively than investors in ETFs sold by other fund firms.
Though Vanguard’s study doesn’t report the relative returns of Vanguard’s retail investors in ETFs and open-end funds, Bogle says he is confident that the more-frequent trading of the ETF investors led to lower returns on average.
This suspicion is strengthened by the findings of a 2013 study of all the portfolio transactions between 2005 and 2010 from one of the largest brokerages in Germany. The researchers found that performance deteriorated for the average investor after he or she began investing in “easy-to-trade index-linked securities” such as ETFs.
Utpal Bhattacharya, a finance professor at Indiana University’s Kelley School of Business and one of the co-authors of this study, said that the cause of this deterioration was the “bad market timing” that the typical investor engaged in after investing in ETFs.
For example, the average investor tended to buy an ETF right before the market fell, and to sell just before a rise — just the opposite of the buying-low/selling-high behavior that would improve performance.
Investment advisers also appear to be struggling with ETFs, according to a Hulbert Financial Digest study of 23 monitored advisers who maintain both a model portfolio of ETFs as well as one focusing on open-end funds. Their ETF portfolios over the past five years trailed their non-ETF fund portfolios by an average of 2.5 percentage points on an annualized basis.