Customer Reviews Investing with ExchangeTraded Funds Made Easy A StarttoFinish Plan to Reduce

Post on: 13 Апрель, 2015 No Comment

Customer Reviews Investing with ExchangeTraded Funds Made Easy A StarttoFinish Plan to Reduce

This review is from: Investing with Exchange-Traded Funds Made Easy: A Start-to-Finish Plan to Reduce Costs and Achieve Higher Returns (2nd Edition) (Hardcover)

Unless I’m missing something (and I doubt I am) the Ultimate ETF Strategy described in this book CLEARLY would have resulted in a miserable failure in 2008. The stock market is currently down roughly 40%, and the REITS index is down over 50% as of this writing. If you had put 25% into a REITs index ETF, 25% into a total bond index find, 25% into either a foreign or domestic stock index ETF, and the other 25% into an investment style ETF (either Large or Small, and either Growth or value) prescribed in this book, you would have lost an incredible amount of your investment in 2008. Likely the only portion that would have been relatively flat would have been the bond ETF, which is 25% of the strategy. I believe you likely also would have lost with this strategy in 2007 too.

NOTE: The Ultimate ETF Strategy has an interest rate indicator which is supposed to be a signal to get out of half the equities which would leave you 25% exposed instead of 50%. I didn’t follow this signal, but I DOUBT this signal would have gotten triggered in 2008, since I believe either an inverted curve or higher yields compared to the previous 6 months was the trigger. TNX Yield has generally gone down for 2008 and the curve wasn’t inverted. Even if triggered, which I doubt was the case, I believe, the investor would still be 25% invested in equities instead of 50%, and you still would be 25% invested in REITS, so 2008 would still have been a horrible year.

One key problem with this book, as alluded to by another reviewer, is that the research data goes back to the early 1980s, and the past 25 years or so have generally been a bullish period for stocks. The basic idea behind this book is that you stay 50% invested in equities most of the time (except when the interest rate trigger makes you get only 25% invested in equities, with the other 25% in cash). Based on trends, you make sure the two stock ETFS you own (or one ETF when the interest rate trigger had gotten you out of the other ETF) have been outperformers relative to other indices (until the performance trend changes). 25% goes into a total bond market index ETF and the other 25% goes into a REITS index ETF. (the latter got CRUSHED in 2008 even more than equities at the time of this writing)

The premise (whether stated or implied) is that, since this strategy had outperformed the market for, *roughly*, the past 25 years (at time the book was written), and had been a profitable strategy for that time period, then it is likely to be an outperforming and profitable strategy in the future. The problem, as I see it, is that the 25 year period beginning at the time this book was published may be very different in terms of performance compared to the prior 25 years!

I followed this strategy in 2007, except that I didn’t buy a REITs ETF, because it looked to me like a REITs were in a BUBBLE (good decision on my part!), and I bought a Fidelity Short Term Bond fund instead of a Total Bond Index ETF (not-so-great decision on my part). However, I decided to abandon this strategy altogether in December of 2007 and sold ALL my equities by the 1st week of January. (one of the best financial decisions of my life!)

I had abandoned this strategy when I read about the problems in the financial sector, housing sector, and the credit markets. Thankfully, I saved myself a lot of money by NOT following this strategy!

In 2008, I made money trading in and out of the market (including shorting the market), while the world at large lost 40% or more of their money buying and holding stock indices. My opinion is that buying and holding stock indices for the long term is not going to be the ticket to high returns that it was 25 years ago, even if holding the indices that are relative outperformers (such as holding the S&P if it outperforms EFA, or holding a Small Cap growth if it has outperformed large growth, or large cap value).

Frankly, I do NOT recommend anyone follow this strategy, or any other strategy that would leave you exposed to equities throughout a major bear market (in terms of length or in terms of percentage).

Do yourselves a favor, and find a chart of the Japanese Nikkei 225. In 1990, the Nikkei was around 40,000. Now it’s under 9,000 and it is almost 19 years later. Buy and hold would have lost you a fortune! Same thing could be happening in the USA for the next 10 or 20 years.

Don’t be fooled into thinking that stocks can’t have 20 or even 30 year year periods where the returns are lousy relative to simple money market accounts. I would not bet the farm on ANY strategy that would keep you exposed to equities and REITs all the time. The lack of a satisfactory EXIT strategy for equities or REITS is a major flaw in the Ultimate ETF Strategy described in this book.

Sorry, but I can’t recommend this book, unless you are comfortable with the idea of potentially losing a lot of money. Strategies that were successful for the 25 year period before the book was published will not necessarily work well from that point forward.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Categories
Stocks  
Tags
Here your chance to leave a comment!