The fund awards portion of the gala covers a variety of different product categories:

• Mutual/Segregated funds
• Exchange-traded funds
• Hedge funds
• Pooled funds

There are separate juries devoted to each product type, and the various awards for each product type are decided upon by the respective juries. Any fund that meets certain criteria is eligible to win an award. The eligibility requirements will be clearly detailed for each product type.

Awards Process/Criteria:

The awards process includes five distinct stages:

Initial Quantitative Screening Criteria

Analysts are responsible for ensuring their nominations meet the eligibility requirements. Final results will be vetted by the audit committee to ensure all winners and runners up meet the criteria.

Nomination Stage

Analysts submit, at most, three nominees for each category.

Analysts must provide rationale to support each nomination.

Analyst Open Forum Discussion

Analysts hold an open forum discussion (or a series of them) to identify any nominated funds that do not meet the eligibility requirements and decide on issues that require judgment. For example, if one member of a management team leaves, does this breach the eligibility criteria that states the same management team must be in place over the past three years?

Analysts will then have an opportunity to question the suitability of any of the nominated funds.

Final Selection

Analysts submit their final votes for each category, once again providing rationale for their submission.

Audit Committee Final Review

Audit committee does a last check to ensure all funds meet the eligibility requirements. It also ensures all company/fund names are stated correctly.

Analytical Guidelines

The various juries consist of analysts from across the fund industry. Each jury member is an expert in his or her field and, as such, is free to evaluate the eligible funds in their own framework. However, Morningstar offers the following guidelines for the issues jury members should consider when voting. It is important to note that these are guidelines only, and committee members can consider relevant issues that are not listed and can weigh the following issues as they see fit.

Conflicts of Interest

To prevent conflicts of interest, jurors are prohibited from nominating or voting for any investment product or product initiative offered by their employer, including employers parent organizations. Jurors are also prohibited from nominating or voting for a Morningstar-affiliated investment product, such as an ETF that tracks a Morningstar-designed index. It is the responsibility of the chairperson of each jury to ensure jurors ability to render an independent judgment is not compromised. The final review by the audit committee provides another check against potential conflicts of interest.

Quantitative Considerations:

• Absolute performance
• Relative performance
• Risk/return profile (relative to a benchmark or peer group)
• Style consistency
• Tax efficiency
• Price

Qualitative Considerations:

• Investment objective/product structure
• Capacity constraints

Morningstar Manager of the Year Methodology:

Morningstar fund analysts choose Manager of the Year awards in three categories: Domestic equity, foreign equity, and fixed income. Winners will not only have been successful in the most recent period but over the long haul.

Each fund analyst is responsible for nominating potential contenders in each of the groups. Nominees must meet the following criteria:

• Managements fund assignment should have been given a positive rating (Gold, Silver, or Bronze) by Morningstars fund research team
• Strong performance in the current calendar year and prior 12-month period
• Excellent risk-adjusted long-term performance
• History of unit holder-friendly behaviour

Analysts also consider managers co-investment levels, the strength and risks of their process, and the quality of their investment decision making. They look at factors such as fund capacity to gauge the likelihood of a nominee repeating their past success.

Morningstars fund research team serves as the jury for this award. Analysts share the rationale for their nominations with the group. The group plays a devils advocacy role to ensure each nominee is thoroughly vetted and meets the standard for the award.