Monte Carlo Simulation and GBM (Topic Review)

Post on: 16 Март, 2015 No Comment

Monte Carlo Simulation and GBM (Topic Review)

Nicole Manley Administrator

Questions:

Note: for the questions below, we provide the following snippet from the standard normal CDF lookup table:

323.1. Assume a stock price following a geometric Brownian motion (GBM) process such that the natural log of the future stock price, S(t), is approximately normal:

The current stock price, S(0), is $48.00 with volatility of 36.0% per annum. The expected return (mu) is 18.0% per annum. Assuming this model, which is nearest to the probability that the stock price will end the year (T = 1.0) above $60.00? [Sidebar bonus question: Why is the answer different than N(d2) in BSM, or is it the same?]

a. 17.03%

b. 24.55%

c. 38.21%

d. 44.82%

323.2. Analyst Peter needs to price an American call option with one year to maturity. He has convenient access to only two option pricing models: a Black-Scholes Merton (BSM OPM), which he presumes is exact due to its analytical solution; and a binomial tree with twelve steps, which he presumes is inaccurate due to the low number of steps. He performs the following calculations:

  • For the American option, the binomial model returns a price of $8.70 (which he realizes is inaccurate)
  • He runs the binomial model again, on the same call option, except he assumes it is a European option (i.e. same option parameters but cannot be early exercised); this variant of the binomial returns a price of $8.25.
  • He prices this European option, also, with his Black-Scholes (which he trusts is exact for the European option) and it gives a price of $8.12.
  • Based on these findings, he estimates the value of the American option to be equal to $8.70 + ($8.12 — $8.25) = $8.57.

Which of the following methods did Peter use to estimate the price of the American option?

a. Antithetic variable technique

b. Control variate technique

c. Quasi-random sequences

d. None of the above, Peter's method is without merit

323.3. A Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) assumes that a non-dividend-paying stock follows the process given by the discrete-time version of geometric Brownian motion (gBm):

The initial stock price, S(0), is $100.00. The expected return (mu) is 15.0% per annum. The volatility assumption is 40.0% per annum. Each step in the simulation is five days and the number of trading days per year is 250, such that each time step is 5/250. The random standard normal is generated by inverse transformation of a random uniform variable (with a value from zero to 1.0).

  • For the first week, the random uniform variable is 0.8980
  • For the second week, the random uniform variable is 0.2429

Which are nearest to the simulated stock prices, respectively, at the end of the first and second week?

Categories
FOREX  
Tags
Here your chance to leave a comment!