Clueless on Suitability v Standards
Post on: 16 Март, 2015 No Comment
![Clueless on Suitability v Standards Clueless on Suitability v Standards](/wp-content/uploads/2015/3/fiduciary-vs-suitability-river-wealth-management_3.jpg)
More satisfied with fiduciary relationship, survey finds
As legislators consider how to implement a uniform fiduciary standard for broker-dealers and investment advisors under Dodd-Frank. a new survey reveals that, by a vast majority, full-service customers dont know the difference between the standards that are now in effect.
At issue, of course, is the question of a suitability standard (under which an advisor is required to make investments he judges to be suitable for his clients) vs. a fiduciary standard (under which an advisor is required to act in his clients best interests, and disclose to them all conflicts of interest). The J.D. Power and Associates 2011 U.S. Full Service Investor Satisfaction Study, released Thursday, shows that 85% of full-service investors either have not heard of the difference between the two or do not understand what the difference is.
There is, however, a difference in satisfaction levels between them. Among the full-service clients who have a fiduciary relationship with their advisors, 57% say that increases their comfort level; 42% say it actually reduces their comfort level.
David Lo. director of investment services at J.D. Power and Associates, said of the findings, While higher levels of satisfaction are generally associated with clients in fiduciary relationships, legislating all advisors to this standard carries an unintended consequence of additional compliance oversight, which could translate into significantly higher costslikely to ultimately be passed back to investors.
Lo instead suggested another approach: Placing more focus on key best practices in client management empowers advisors with more actionable direction and achieves satisfaction levels on par with satisfaction among investors in a fiduciary relationship844 vs. 841, respectively.
![Clueless on Suitability v Standards Clueless on Suitability v Standards](/wp-content/uploads/2015/3/clueless-on-suitability-v-standards_1.jpg)
What are those key best practices? Lo lists, in order of importance, the following:
- Clearly communicating reasons for investment performance
- Clearly explaining how fees are charged
- Proactive advisor contact regarding new products and services or accounts four times in the past 12 months
- Returning client calls/inquiries within the same business day
- Reviewing or developing a strategic plan within the past 12 months
- Providing a written financial plan
- Discussing risk tolerance changes and incorporating into plan where appropriate in the past 12 months.
Lo added, Proactive outreach from advisors goes a long way in developing the client-advisor relationship, and expectations as far as frequency of contact have increased coming out of the recession. Advisors can meet this increased need by utilizing more nontraditional forms of communication, such as e-mail and the firms website, which is much more widely accepted by full-service investors of all ages.