Currently browsing the derivatives category.

Flash BoysConcerns Over High Frequency Trading

By Nahal Bahri, J.D. Candidate 2015 | June 1, 2014 at 8:36 am

Credit Derivatives, Re-Defined

Event Recap: Systemic Risk and the Financial Crisis

Europe Reaches Deal on Derivatives Trading

Risk-transfer Deals Pose Roadblocks to Federal Reserve’s New Minimum Liquidity Proposal

Week in Review: JPMorgan Returns to the Hot Seat

By Christopher Hammond, J.D. Candidate 2015 | September 27, 2013 at 6:22 am

Once again, JPMorgan found itself discussing yet another settlement and facing bad publicity linked to excessive risk-taking.  Last week, news broke that the bank had agreed to a $920 million settlement in the “London Whale” derivatives trading case; plus, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ordered JPMorgan to refund over $300 million to customers based on alleged wrongdoing in its credit card and debt collection procedures.

Another settlement deal surfaced this week—and its numbers are much larger.  The U.S. Department of Justice is seeking $11 billion (with a ‘B’) in compensation for JPMorgan’s actions leading up to the Financial Crisis, including selling mortgage backed securities the bank knew were essentially worthless.  According to the Washington Post. it would be “the biggest settlement a single company has ever undertaken.”  On Thursday, the bank’s visible CEO Jamie Diamond flew to Washington, D.C. to meet with Attorney General Eric Holder for nearly an hour.  Instead of lobbying for looser restrictions on Wall Street, Diamond was seeking an end to federal and state probes (which still represent a large liability to the bank) and, perhaps more importantly, attempting to avoid criminal charges.

All of the rhetoric and press releases notwithstanding, the Administration’s handling of numerous JPMorgan investigations has been properly criticized for missing an opportunity to charge top Executives.  The S.E.C. D.O.J. and other regulators have thus far failed to press criminal charges, even when financial disclosures have misrepresented the bank’s business or mortgage-backed products.  To be sure, the government has charged front-line traders in the London Whale case, but those tasked with overseeing the bank’s actions have escaped indictment—perhaps for the very reason that Mr. Diamond is willing to personally negotiate with the nation’s top law enforcement official on their behalf.

While the financial penalties being discussed are stiff, they represent only a small fraction of the damage done to the global economy, JPMorgan shareholders, and (ultimately) dinner tables across the country.  Columbia Law School professor John C. Coffee Jr. provided some insight to the back-and-forth.  He told the Post :  “If I was in [Holder’s] position, I would be concerned about my legacy.   There’s been a lot of criticism of officials in Justice being much too soft, timid.”

CFTC and European Commission Reach Deal on Cross-Border Derivatives

By James Kollar | July 12, 2013 at 10:15 am