Restricted stock and RSUs How are they taxed

Post on: 28 Май, 2015 No Comment

Restricted stock and RSUs How are they taxed

Over the last seven years, restricted stock and restricted stock units (RSUs) have grown in popularity as incentive compensation tools, while the use of stock options has declined. So its important for employers and employees alike to understand their tax implications.

A restricted stock award is a grant of common stock thats nontransferable and subject to forfeiture until it has vested. Typically, vesting requirements are tied to continued employment, achievement of pre-established performance goals or both. An RSU is a contractual right to receive stock (or its cash value) after the award has vested.

Advantages over options

For employers, stock options used to have a big advantage over other incentive compensation tools: They enabled companies to provide executives and other employees with valuable benefits without recording compensation expense on their financial statements. This advantage disappeared after the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) amended its accounting standards for share-based payments in 2004, requiring companies to estimate the fair value of stock options on the grant date and report that value as compensation expense.

Options remain an attractive benefit, offering significant upside potential for employees. But restricted stock and RSUs also have some advantages. For example, they generally retain value despite market volatility, whereas options can become worthless in a down market. Also, from the employers perspective, restricted stock and RSUs generally involve fewer shares, so they cause less ownership dilution.

Sizing up the tax benefits

Restricted stock provides an attractive but risky opportunity for employees. If they make whats known as an 83(b) election to pay tax on the stocks market value when they receive it. they can convert any future appreciation in value into long-term capital gains, which enjoy more favorable tax treatment. But it can be risky because, if they ultimately forfeit the stock, theyll have paid tax on income they never receive.

Without an 83(b) election, employees are taxed at ordinary-income rates on the stocks market value when it vests. If the stock appreciates in value, their tax bills will potentially be higher than they would have been under the 83(b) election but if they forfeit the stock, theyre not taxed.

RSUs, on the other hand, arent eligible for the 83(b) election, so theres no opportunity to convert ordinary income into capital gains. But they do offer a limited ability to defer income taxes. Unlike restricted stock awards, which become taxable immediately upon vesting, RSUs arent taxable until the employee actually receives the stock. So rather than having the stock delivered immediately upon vesting, the employer and employee can agree to delay delivery, which will defer the employees income tax. Keep in mind, however, that any income deferral must satisfy the strict requirements of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 409A.

From the employers perspective, RSUs offer several benefits:

  • With RSUs, the employer controls the timing of its compensation expense deduction because the expense is deductible when the stock is delivered. With restricted stock, the expense is deductible either when the stock is awarded or when it vests, depending on whether the employee makes an 83(b) election.
  • RSUs may generate larger compensation expense deductions. If the stock price goes up between the time RSUs are awarded and delivery of the stock, the employer enjoys a larger deduction. With restricted stock, if an employee files an 83(b) election, the employers deduction is limited to the stocks value at the time of the award. (On the down side, with RSUs, if the stock price falls, the employers deduction may shrink.)
  • The employer avoids the administrative expense of issuing stock unless and until RSUs vest.
  • Employees dont have voting rights or receive dividends until they actually receive stock (although some RSU plans pay dividend equivalents).

For public companies, its also important to consider IRC Sec. 162(m), which places a $1 million limit on deductions for compensation paid to certain top executives. Some types of compensation are excluded from the limit, including qualified performance-based compensation.

This includes restricted stock and RSUs that vest based on pre-established, objective performance goals and meet several other requirements. A 2012 IRS ruling clarifies that, even if restricted stock or RSUs meet these requirements, any related dividends or dividend equivalents must separately qualify as performance-based compensation.

Weigh your options

Restricted stock and RSUs can be an attractive alternative to options. If your company is considering these incentive compensation tools, make sure you understand the relevant tax considerations for the company and its employees. And if youre the recipient of such compensation, its important to understand the tax consequences and the planning opportunities.


Categories
Cash  
Tags
Here your chance to leave a comment!