December 30, 2012 3:01 am

For us, there are two ways to split the euro zone in two parts, either unilateral exists or the introduction of the Northern Euro. With this currency, people in the Northern states would finally consume more. See here our analysis why the Northern Euro will needed against global and European trade imbalances and against excessive austerity in Southern Europe.

First proposal: Unilateral exits: Is Ita ly leaving the euro?

One way is unilateral exits as Italy may do after the next elecions . The technical prime minister Monti is supposed to govern only till Spring 2013 or even earlier. Currently the anti-euro movement 5 Stelle would obtain 20.6% in elections, Berlusconis PDL 17.3%. The pro-Euro left-wing party gets 25.7%. (Other voters undecided). This result would probably give an anti-euro majority. 

The main author of this blog  speaks Italian and lived in Italy a long time. Italians are since the beginning are not happy with the euro, many think that prices doubled due to the euro, but salaries remained the same. In Germany this attitude was initially the same, but vanished with the time when prices became relatively cheaper. In Italy this internal opposition against the euro did never go away, consumer prices  kept rising and are now as high as in Germany, but salaries are half or even less.

Italy is effectively the country which is most opposed to the euro (source ). Recent data even shows that 45% of Italians want to return to the lira .

The full detail on a potential Italian euro exit can be found here .

We admit that an exit of a euro member might trigger irrational behaviors and bank-runs. By the beginning of 2013 however, QE3 and the ECBs OMT operation have eliminated tail risks and risk aversion. Therefore we see upcoming inflation in the Northern European countries, while Southern Europe will need to adjust salaries downwards.

 In this scenario we propose a second solution.

Second proposal: Step-by-step creation of the Northern Euro

Our proposal is a reasonably slow process of a Northern Euro creation, where small countries like Finland or the Netherlands would exit the euro first and build up the Northern Euro together with the later joining Germany. Only the problem countries would remain in the (Southern, the existing) euro. After initial inflation they will then take profit of a strong devaluation, make their exports competitive and allow for their own monetary and fiscal policy. Similarly to the Swiss economy that expanded despite a rising franc thanks to cheaper prices and strong consumer spending, the German economy will stay competitive even with a strong Northern Euro, provided that the Northern Euro does not appreciate too quickly.

As compared to the southern countries, that rely more on labor, Germanys exports have a bigger capital and technology part, for which prices do not increase with a stronger currency, technology and capital becomes cheaper. Therefore Germany will not suffer if the appreciation of the Northern Euro is only gradually.

We know that many technical and legal details have still to be developed for our approach. But we give here already an idea.

Central Banks of Northern and Southern Euro will need to adopt the SNB approach

For us the SNB will implement a crawling peg from 2014 or 2015 (which year depends on the state of the global economy). We think that the Swiss will allow a franc appreciation per year by about 2%. This means that the minimum rate of the EUR/CHF will be 1.18 e.g. in 2014, 1.12 in 2015, etc.

Similarly to the EUR/CHF peg of the Swiss National Bank (SNB), both central banks of the Northern Euro and the Southern Euro will need to work together to prevent a sudden appreciation of the Northern Euro, especially later when Germany joins it. A rise of more than 10% per year against the Southern Euro should not be allowed. Similarly as the ECB euro purchases in the year 2001 (see next chapter) or the ones of the SNB, the Northern Euro Central Bank (NECB) will be obliged to purchase (Southern) euros to limit the appreciation of its (Northern) currency.

Currency purchases of the Northern European Central Bank will replace potential huge Bundesbank losses on Target2 and on ESM and EFSF by the Northern states. Similarly as the Swiss, the NECB will need to realize certain losses, which however will be limited by the restrictions on bond purchases.

Restrictions on government bond purchases and redemptions

Purchases of government bonds of Northern European countries shall be restricted to domestic buyers. New issues of government bonds shall be redeemed only by domestic holders. Old issues remain valid in order to prevent a technical default of German and other Northern European countries. Rating agencies might declare bonds of Germany and the other Northern countries as defaulted.

Despite this thread, the Northern European government should consider paying back existing issues only in (Southern, old) euros and changing the local law for it. English law bonds will probably require the re-denomination from (Southern) euros into Northern euros.

The retro-perspective from the year 2030

We have created a hypothetical retroperspective from the year 2030, but we are quite sure that the euro will not survive the year 2020 without the exit of at least 2 members (not only Greece…).

Both euro exit solutions might be once-off painful, but they will prevent endless transfer payments from the north to the south, something we see inside Italy for centuries, where the north pays for the south.

The advantages are obvious: The two zones are a lot more than the old euro an optimum currency area. Companies will only need to look at exchange rates only when they switch zones (vs. the old pro-euro argument).

Better to split the Euro zone in two instead of an endless euro delirium and transfers into the Southern countries, who will never make it.

Some more ideas about the Northern euro introduction

“It’s (Long Past) Time for a ‘Northern’ Euro ” by Andrew Stuttaford. National Review, July 18, 2011.

Wolfson Prize